Amundi MSCI World V vs Xtrackers FTSE All-World
Amundi MSCI World V tracks MSCI World and Xtrackers FTSE All-World tracks FTSE All-World. They are realistic alternatives for the same slot in a portfolio, but because the indices are different nobody can tell you in advance which will return more. What can be compared objectively is the cost, the replication method, the domicile and how each one is structured — and that is what this page does.
What each one tracks
This is the underlying difference: they do not follow the same index, so their returns will diverge.
Amundi MSCI World V
MSCI World
Xtrackers FTSE All-World
FTSE All-World
Comparison
| Amundi MSCI World V | Xtrackers FTSE All-World | |
|---|---|---|
| Index | MSCI World | FTSE All-World |
| TER | 0.38% | 0.15% |
| Hist. return* | ~8% | ~8% |
| Replication | Physical | Physical |
| Distribution | Accumulating | Accumulating |
| Domicile | Luxemburgo | Irlanda |
| Currency | EUR | USD |
| Risk | 4/7 | 4/7 |
| ISIN | LU1781541179 | IE000L6ZMMC4 |
What the fee gap actually costs
Applying the SAME 7% gross return to both and contributing €300/month, the only thing moving the result is the TER. This is not a return forecast: it is how much the fee weighs.
| Horizon | Amundi MSCI World V | Xtrackers FTSE All-World | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 years | €51,134 | €51,793 | €659 |
| 20 years | €150,086 | €154,339 | €4,252 |
| 30 years | €341,572 | €357,370 | €15,798 |
Xtrackers FTSE All-World is the cheaper of the two. Remember they track different indices: cost is one factor, not the verdict.
Nobody can know which will perform better: they track different indices and past performance is not a prediction. What is objective today is the cost, the replication, the domicile and the distribution policy.
Compare your own portfolio too
Create a free account to track your real portfolio against these indices, save your favorite comparisons, and bookmark the funds you care about.
Create free accountFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between Amundi MSCI World V and Xtrackers FTSE All-World?+
They track different indices: Amundi MSCI World V follows MSCI World and Xtrackers FTSE All-World follows FTSE All-World. They also differ in cost (0.38% vs 0.15% TER), replication (physical vs physical) and domicile (Luxemburgo vs Irlanda).
Which one will perform better?+
Nobody can know that: they track different indices, so their returns will diverge, and past index performance is not a prediction. What you can control today is the cost, the tax structure and whether the index actually covers what you want exposure to.
Which one is cheaper?+
Xtrackers FTSE All-World has the lower annual fee. Applying the same 7% gross return to both with €300/month, that fee gap alone is worth about €4,252 after 20 years — that part is arithmetic, not a forecast.
Accumulating or distributing?+
Both are accumulating, so on this point there is no difference between them.
Can I hold both?+
Yes. Unlike two funds tracking the identical index, these give you genuinely different exposure, so holding both is not automatically redundant — just be aware you may end up overlapping on the largest companies and doubling your rebalancing work.
Other alternatives in the same category
Amundi Prime All Country World vs Amundi MSCI World V
Amundi MSCI World V vs HSBC FTSE All-World
Amundi MSCI World V vs Invesco FTSE All-World
Amundi MSCI World V vs iShares MSCI ACWI
Amundi MSCI World V vs iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility
Amundi MSCI World V vs iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor