Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund vs iShares MSCI China A
Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund tracks MSCI China (Net) and iShares MSCI China A tracks MSCI China A. They are realistic alternatives for the same slot in a portfolio, but because the indices are different nobody can tell you in advance which will return more. What can be compared objectively is the cost, the replication method, the domicile and how each one is structured — and that is what this page does.
What each one tracks
This is the underlying difference: they do not follow the same index, so their returns will diverge.
Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund
MSCI China (Net)
iShares MSCI China A
MSCI China A
Comparison
| Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund | iShares MSCI China A | |
|---|---|---|
| Index | MSCI China (Net) | MSCI China A |
| TER | 1.91% | 0.40% |
| Hist. return* | ~6% | ~5% |
| Replication | Physical | Physical |
| Distribution | Accumulating | Accumulating |
| Domicile | Luxemburgo | Irlanda |
| Currency | EUR | USD |
| Risk | 5/7 | 5/7 |
| ISIN | LU0594300096 | IE00BQT3WG13 |
What the fee gap actually costs
Applying the SAME 7% gross return to both and contributing €300/month, the only thing moving the result is the TER. This is not a return forecast: it is how much the fee weighs.
| Horizon | Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund | iShares MSCI China A | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 years | €47,008 | €51,077 | €4,069 |
| 20 years | €125,128 | €149,723 | €24,595 |
| 30 years | €254,951 | €340,237 | €85,286 |
iShares MSCI China A is the cheaper of the two. Remember they track different indices: cost is one factor, not the verdict.
Nobody can know which will perform better: they track different indices and past performance is not a prediction. What is objective today is the cost, the replication, the domicile and the distribution policy.
Compare your own portfolio too
Create a free account to track your real portfolio against these indices, save your favorite comparisons, and bookmark the funds you care about.
Create free accountFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund and iShares MSCI China A?+
They track different indices: Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund follows MSCI China (Net) and iShares MSCI China A follows MSCI China A. They also differ in cost (1.91% vs 0.40% TER), replication (physical vs physical) and domicile (Luxemburgo vs Irlanda).
Which one will perform better?+
Nobody can know that: they track different indices, so their returns will diverge, and past index performance is not a prediction. What you can control today is the cost, the tax structure and whether the index actually covers what you want exposure to.
Which one is cheaper?+
iShares MSCI China A has the lower annual fee. Applying the same 7% gross return to both with €300/month, that fee gap alone is worth about €24,595 after 20 years — that part is arithmetic, not a forecast.
Accumulating or distributing?+
Both are accumulating, so on this point there is no difference between them.
Can I hold both?+
Yes. Unlike two funds tracking the identical index, these give you genuinely different exposure, so holding both is not automatically redundant — just be aware you may end up overlapping on the largest companies and doubling your rebalancing work.
Other alternatives in the same category
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets vs Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund
Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund vs Fidelity MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund P-ACC-EUR
Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund vs Franklin FTSE China
Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund vs Franklin FTSE India
Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund vs Franklin FTSE Korea
Fidelity Funds - China Consumer Fund vs Franklin FTSE Taiwan