Fidelity Global Technology vs Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100
Fidelity Global Technology tracks Sector tecnológico global (gestión activa) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 tracks Nasdaq-100. They are realistic alternatives for the same slot in a portfolio, but because the indices are different nobody can tell you in advance which will return more. What can be compared objectively is the cost, the replication method, the domicile and how each one is structured — and that is what this page does.
What each one tracks
This is the underlying difference: they do not follow the same index, so their returns will diverge.
Fidelity Global Technology
Sector tecnológico global (gestión activa)
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100
Nasdaq-100
Comparison
| Fidelity Global Technology | Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Index | Sector tecnológico global (gestión activa) | Nasdaq-100 |
| TER | 1.00% | 0.30% |
| Hist. return* | ~12% | ~13% |
| Replication | Physical | Physical |
| Distribution | Accumulating | Distributing |
| Domicile | Luxemburgo | Irlanda |
| Currency | EUR | USD |
| Risk | 5/7 | 5/7 |
| ISIN | LU1560650563 | IE0032077012 |
What the fee gap actually costs
Applying the SAME 7% gross return to both and contributing €300/month, the only thing moving the result is the TER. This is not a return forecast: it is how much the fee weighs.
| Horizon | Fidelity Global Technology | Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 years | €49,410 | €51,362 | €1,953 |
| 20 years | €139,305 | €151,549 | €12,244 |
| 30 years | €302,861 | €346,974 | €44,112 |
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 is the cheaper of the two. Remember they track different indices: cost is one factor, not the verdict.
Nobody can know which will perform better: they track different indices and past performance is not a prediction. What is objective today is the cost, the replication, the domicile and the distribution policy.
Compare your own portfolio too
Create a free account to track your real portfolio against these indices, save your favorite comparisons, and bookmark the funds you care about.
Create free accountFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between Fidelity Global Technology and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100?+
They track different indices: Fidelity Global Technology follows Sector tecnológico global (gestión activa) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 follows Nasdaq-100. They also differ in cost (1.00% vs 0.30% TER), replication (physical vs physical) and domicile (Luxemburgo vs Irlanda).
Which one will perform better?+
Nobody can know that: they track different indices, so their returns will diverge, and past index performance is not a prediction. What you can control today is the cost, the tax structure and whether the index actually covers what you want exposure to.
Which one is cheaper?+
Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 has the lower annual fee. Applying the same 7% gross return to both with €300/month, that fee gap alone is worth about €12,244 after 20 years — that part is arithmetic, not a forecast.
Accumulating or distributing?+
Fidelity Global Technology is accumulating (dividends are reinvested inside the fund) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 is distributing (dividends are paid out to you). For long-term compounding in Spain, accumulating usually defers taxation; distributing gives you income you are taxed on each year.
Can I hold both?+
Yes. Unlike two funds tracking the identical index, these give you genuinely different exposure, so holding both is not automatically redundant — just be aware you may end up overlapping on the largest companies and doubling your rebalancing work.