HSBC MSCI USA Quality vs iShares Core S&P 500
HSBC MSCI USA Quality tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality and iShares Core S&P 500 tracks S&P 500. They are realistic alternatives for the same slot in a portfolio, but because the indices are different nobody can tell you in advance which will return more. What can be compared objectively is the cost, the replication method, the domicile and how each one is structured — and that is what this page does.
What each one tracks
This is the underlying difference: they do not follow the same index, so their returns will diverge.
HSBC MSCI USA Quality
MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality
iShares Core S&P 500
S&P 500
Comparison
| HSBC MSCI USA Quality | iShares Core S&P 500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Index | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality | S&P 500 |
| TER | 0.15% | 0.07% |
| Hist. return* | ~10% | ~10% |
| Replication | Physical | Physical |
| Distribution | Distributing | Accumulating |
| Domicile | Irlanda | Irlanda |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Risk | 4/7 | 4/7 |
| ISIN | IE00B5WFQ436 | IE00B5BMR087 |
What the fee gap actually costs
Applying the SAME 7% gross return to both and contributing €300/month, the only thing moving the result is the TER. This is not a return forecast: it is how much the fee weighs.
| Horizon | HSBC MSCI USA Quality | iShares Core S&P 500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 years | €51,793 | €52,025 | €232 |
| 20 years | €154,339 | €155,851 | €1,513 |
| 30 years | €357,370 | €363,061 | €5,691 |
iShares Core S&P 500 is the cheaper of the two. Remember they track different indices: cost is one factor, not the verdict.
Nobody can know which will perform better: they track different indices and past performance is not a prediction. What is objective today is the cost, the replication, the domicile and the distribution policy.
Compare your own portfolio too
Create a free account to track your real portfolio against these indices, save your favorite comparisons, and bookmark the funds you care about.
Create free accountFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between HSBC MSCI USA Quality and iShares Core S&P 500?+
They track different indices: HSBC MSCI USA Quality follows MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality and iShares Core S&P 500 follows S&P 500. They also differ in cost (0.15% vs 0.07% TER), replication (physical vs physical) and domicile (Irlanda vs Irlanda).
Which one will perform better?+
Nobody can know that: they track different indices, so their returns will diverge, and past index performance is not a prediction. What you can control today is the cost, the tax structure and whether the index actually covers what you want exposure to.
Which one is cheaper?+
iShares Core S&P 500 has the lower annual fee. Applying the same 7% gross return to both with €300/month, that fee gap alone is worth about €1,513 after 20 years — that part is arithmetic, not a forecast.
Accumulating or distributing?+
iShares Core S&P 500 is accumulating (dividends are reinvested inside the fund) and HSBC MSCI USA Quality is distributing (dividends are paid out to you). For long-term compounding in Spain, accumulating usually defers taxation; distributing gives you income you are taxed on each year.
Can I hold both?+
Yes. Unlike two funds tracking the identical index, these give you genuinely different exposure, so holding both is not automatically redundant — just be aware you may end up overlapping on the largest companies and doubling your rebalancing work.