Alternatives in the same category

Invesco MSCI Europe vs iShares Core MSCI EMU

Invesco MSCI Europe tracks MSCI Europe and iShares Core MSCI EMU tracks MSCI EMU. They are realistic alternatives for the same slot in a portfolio, but because the indices are different nobody can tell you in advance which will return more. What can be compared objectively is the cost, the replication method, the domicile and how each one is structured — and that is what this page does.

What each one tracks

This is the underlying difference: they do not follow the same index, so their returns will diverge.

Invesco MSCI Europe

MSCI Europe

iShares Core MSCI EMU

MSCI EMU

Comparison

Invesco MSCI EuropeiShares Core MSCI EMU
IndexMSCI EuropeMSCI EMU
TER0.12%0.12%
Hist. return*~7%~7%
ReplicationPhysicalPhysical
DistributionAccumulatingAccumulating
DomicileIrelandIreland
CurrencyEUREUR
Risk4/74/7
ISINIE00B60SWY32IE00B53QG562

What the fee gap actually costs

Applying the SAME 7% gross return to both and contributing €300/month, the only thing moving the result is the TER. This is not a return forecast: it is how much the fee weighs.

HorizonInvesco MSCI EuropeiShares Core MSCI EMUDifference
10 years€51,880€51,880€0
20 years€154,904€154,904€0
30 years€359,492€359,492€0

Both fees are effectively identical, so cost should not decide this choice.

Nobody can know which will perform better: they track different indices and past performance is not a prediction. What is objective today is the cost, the replication, the domicile and the distribution policy.

Compare your own portfolio too

Create a free account to track your real portfolio against these indices, save your favorite comparisons, and bookmark the funds you care about.

Create free account

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Invesco MSCI Europe and iShares Core MSCI EMU?+

They track different indices: Invesco MSCI Europe follows MSCI Europe and iShares Core MSCI EMU follows MSCI EMU. They also differ in cost (0.12% vs 0.12% TER), replication (physical vs physical) and domicile (Ireland vs Ireland).

Which one will perform better?+

Nobody can know that: they track different indices, so their returns will diverge, and past index performance is not a prediction. What you can control today is the cost, the tax structure and whether the index actually covers what you want exposure to.

Which one is cheaper?+

Their fees are effectively identical (0.12% vs 0.12%), so cost should not decide this one. Look at index coverage, distribution policy and availability at your broker instead.

Accumulating or distributing?+

Both are accumulating, so on this point there is no difference between them.

Can I hold both?+

Yes. Unlike two funds tracking the identical index, these give you genuinely different exposure, so holding both is not automatically redundant — just be aware you may end up overlapping on the largest companies and doubling your rebalancing work.

← Back to funds