L&G vs VanEck
Both providers track indices, so neither "performs" better than the other — what separates them is cost, range and which markets they actually cover. L&G has 7 products in this catalog and VanEck has 11, overlapping in 3 categories. VanEck offers the cheapest fund in 2 of those 3 categories.
L&G
- Products
- 7
- Lowest TER
- 0.49%
- Average TER
- 0.53%
- Categories
- 3
VanEck
- Products
- 11
- Lowest TER
- 0.25%
- Average TER
- 0.48%
- Categories
- 6
Which one is cheaper, and where
VanEck offers the cheapest fund in 2 of the 3 categories both cover.
The cheapest fund from each, category by category
Each provider’s lowest-fee product within every shared category, head to head. The index each one tracks is shown too, because two funds in the same category do not always track the same thing.
| Category | L&G | VanEck | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thematic | L&G Battery Value-ChainSolactive Battery Value-Chain0.49% | VanEck SemiconductorMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped0.35% | €14/year per €10,000 |
| Technology | L&G Artificial IntelligenceROBO Global Artificial Intelligence0.49% | VanEck Video Gaming and eSportsMVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports0.55% | €6/year per €10,000 |
| Gold | L&G Gold MiningSTOXX Global Gold Miners0.55% | VanEck Gold MinersNYSE Arca Gold Miners0.53% | €2/year per €10,000 |
What each one covers
Only at L&G
—
Only at VanEck
Structural differences
L&G
- Accumulating
- 100%
- Physical replication
- 100%
- Are ETFs
- 100%
- Domicile
- Ireland
VanEck
- Accumulating
- 91%
- Physical replication
- 100%
- Are ETFs
- 100%
- Domicile
- Ireland, Netherlands
Other provider comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Is L&G or VanEck cheaper?+
VanEck offers the cheapest fund in 2 of the 3 categories both cover, against 1 for L&G. But "cheaper overall" is the wrong question: what matters is which is cheaper in the category you are actually buying.
Where is the difference between L&G and VanEck biggest?+
In a specific thematic sector: L&G Battery Value-Chain charges 0.49% against 0.35% for VanEck Semiconductor. On €10,000 invested that is a €14.00 difference every year, in favour of VanEck.
Which one has the wider range?+
VanEck, with 11 products against 7. Coverage is not identical either: VanEck covers high-dividend companies, sustainable (ESG) criteria, listed real estate where L&G does not.
Are there structural differences beyond fees?+
Yes. L&G's products in this catalog are 100% accumulating and 100% physically replicated, domiciled in Ireland. VanEck's are 91% accumulating and 100% physical, domiciled in Ireland, Netherlands. For a Spanish investor the accumulating/distributing split matters for tax, and domicile matters for dividend withholding.
Does this comparison look at past performance?+
No, deliberately. Two funds tracking the same index deliver almost identical returns before fees, so comparing their past returns tells you about the index, not about the provider. The fee is the part the provider actually controls, and the only one you know for certain the day you invest.
Cost and coverage comparison computed over this site’s catalog, which is a sample and not each provider’s full product range. Returns are not compared: two funds tracking the same index perform almost identically before fees, so past performance tells you about the index, not the provider. Educational content, not a recommendation.